#Use subvert in a sentence trial#

Salomone did add a high-risk, active GPS as a condition of release due to the lengthy sentence he could be facing and past substance abuse-related offenses while previously out on bond.

Serrott adopted or encouraged any of the threats made by the other speaking party.” She wrote that while the statements made by the person calling Serrott were, “extremely concerning,” she “does not find that Mr. Later in the day Thursday, Salomone issued a ruling and kept Serrott’s bond at $100,000. Salomone said she wanted to be sure she was not raising bond simply because Serrott was now able to post it, but also said she needed to alter his release conditions anyway and so would consider Dougherty’s request and review the jail calls before allowing Serrott’s release. Meanwhile, Serrott’s pending release on bond also became an issue, as one of the conditions of his release was supervision by a program that no longer offers the service.īoulder County District Attorney Michael Dougherty also stated that the person who collected and intended to post Serrott’s bond made several concerning statements in jail calls to Serrott about killing people.ĭougherty asked for an increase in bond, as the calls led prosecutors to believe Serrott was a public safety risk.

#Use subvert in a sentence trial#

Salomone said following the bench conference that attorneys believed they had a solution to the issue Rawlings raised, but would set a status conference a few days before the trial just in case. The decision even surprised Rawlings, who said “I did not expect him to make that statement,” and asked to confer with Salomone about an unrelated issue that might impact his ability to try the case. It was only after Salomone read Serrott a list of the charges and the possible penalties he faced that Serrott said he had changed his mind and would keep Rawlings. With Rawlings having filed a motion to withdraw, Serrott appeared set to go forward with representing himself and indicated so several times during the hearing. “(Rawlings) is here, he remains able to represent you, and the court will order that he go forward as your counsel, but you’re trying to force a third alternative, and there is not a third alternative.” “I’ve found that you do not have good cause to continue this trial, and the court finds you are making efforts to delay this trial,” Salomone said. So despite Serrott again protesting that he had a right to a court-appointed defense attorney, Salmone said Serrott could either retain Rawlings or represent himself in April. “The court believes this is an effort to delay this trial.” Serrott says he wants to do by continuing this trial,” Salomone said. “The intention and ability make bond really belies the accuracy of what Mr.

That meant he likely would not be eligible for a court-appointed attorney and, in Salomone’s opinion, gave Serrott “every reason to delay this trial.” Salomone at the hearing then gave Serrott a choice between retaining Rawlings or representing himself at trial, and gave him until Thursday to weigh his options and discuss things with Rawlings.Īt a hearing Thursday, Salomone reiterated her decision and also noted Serrott had since raised the money to post bond.